The article on the media and its effect on the criminal justice system can be closely related to, perhaps not the story, but the way it was potrayed. The media has a way with making one understand the story in perhaps a more dramatic way than necesarry. Mentioning that the location of the drug ring was beside a school is not what I am referring to, but how it was stated in the article title and how it was referred to simply made it seem as a ploy to gain viewers. In this way, the media is reconstructing the nuances of the story which can inturn inspire various emotions in the reader. Additionally, it listed the various charges that each of the household members recieved which were many:
- 4 indictments for manufacturing/delivery of a controlled substance
- 1 indictment for engaging in organized criminal activity
- 1 charge of manufacturing/delivery of a controlled substance in a drug-free zone
- 5 charges of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon
- 1 charge of child endangerment
- 3 charges of theft of a firearm
- 1 charge of possession of marijuana in a drug-free zone
- 4 indictments for manufacturing/delivery of a controlled substance
- 1 indictment for engaging in organized criminal activity
- 1 charge of manufacturing/delivery of a controlled substance, more than 4 grams
- 2 charges of child endangerment
- 1 charge of possession of a controlled substance, less than 28 grams, in a drug-free zone
Along with many others. The surplus of charges, whether rightfully or wrongfully attained, increases my awareness of the increasingly punitive nature of our criminal justice system, which is a major way this story coincides with the above mentioned article.
This crime coverage could only be considered a form of entertainment if entertaining could be defined as anything that increases the dramatic appeal of the story. This case coverage could influence CJ policy by making people think we need to crack down more on school areas or monitor more the areas where there are many people in one house or some obscure reason, instead for say, attacking the reasons many people resort to selling drugs in the first place: their economic status. The system could instead, turn to more retributive justice ways, as opposed to a restorative justice route. This article was very straight forward and at first glance didn't seem to raise any question in my mind but if you analyze its fundemental value, the systemic influence of the media's perspective is abundant.
http://www.click2houston.com/news/25299851/detail.html
America is a very individualistic place so it isn't surprising that our newspapers reflect that in how they portray crimes. Citing someone's socio-economic status as a reason for why they chose a life of crime conflicts with the American ideal that anyone can make it big legally as long as they try hard enough. About the school being included in the story, I agree with you. Unless the drug ring was actively dealing to kids at the nearby school it doesn't seem pertinent.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what you said about someone's socio-economic status being imperative to the type of work they do. The cycle of povery in America and throughout the world is a cyclical trap which is hard to transcend inside the law sometimes, and a "holier than thou" attitude can set us back as a society.
ReplyDeleteHow dare they?! Next to a school?! Yeah, doesn't really have anything to do with the crime unless the nearby students were at a potential risk for violence due to the drug sales..
ReplyDeleteHah! I think it's funny that they emphasize the school so much when there's probably a kid selling drugs IN the school. I also think it's important too that you brought up the idea of low SES contributing to the distribution of drugs. I've read a lot of articles saying if we get rid of the low poverity line, that we can rid of a lot of crimes too. Maybe people will be happier by not having to worry about money so much that they won't have to resort to drugs (although I'm sure people still do drugs even if they are happy).
ReplyDelete