Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Hurricane Katrina

I chose to examine articles pertaining to Hurricane Katrina. I chose this because I expected to find some articles with a skewed perspective, and some factual. If the perspectives were skewed, it was very subtle, except for one. One article I found described Hurricane Katrina as one of the deadliest natural disasters in American history, while the other two articles I looked at described other Hurricanes that imposed more damage to American soil, such as hurricane Andrew. One article I found was on how Bush did not include Hurricane Katrina in his State of the Union Address. It explicitly states how Bush is ashamed because people died as a result of his inaction, people suffered as a result of his inaction etc etc. This particular article is very swayed in one direction. It describes how he made major mistakes. The other two aricles stay on the more factual side including the details of the Hurricane, how the poor and the aged were specifically impacted and so on. I think that upon researching any specific incident, people can find varying forms of information. The ease of publishing information on the internet is so intense, that people can be free to speak their own mind, which is exactly what I am doing now.

4 comments:

  1. I totally agree with your statement that because publishing on the internet has become so easy now a days, many different views and accounts of the same story can be found. I thought it was interesting how two of your sources stayed pretty factual while the other was skewed to one perspective because I also found this to be true with my article about the Eiffel Tower bomb threat. CNN and MSNBC both seemed to stick to the facts more than FOX who seemed to sensationalize the story more by enhancing the possible terrorist perspective. As a result, due to instances like these, as a reader, it is always important to evaluate the credibility of the source before taking what is being presented to heart.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also agree with everything that you said about the internet. Publishers are able to make things sound so good that you can't help to believe them. It also sounds to me like the one publisher had it out for President Bush. Overall, extremely interesting article, and I think it helps us realize just how skewed the media can be when reporting major stories.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Make sure to cite your sources for this article. What news sources did you use?

    ReplyDelete
  4. sorry I don't know why I didn't site my sources. I thought I did. http://www.katrina.noaa.gov/, http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/special-reports/katrina.html and last but not least, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7004942

    ReplyDelete